Well that is a backtrack from Richard Dawkins if I ever I saw one . Note he does not deny what he said .....Because he clearly said it . I heard it and so did millions of others .And using a vaque excuse like " I tried to give intelligent design its best shot ." Strange how such an intelligent fella could have been fooled into doing this interview . And then claiming he had never heard of Ben Stein .........What a laugh. And using the quote from Bertrand Russel asking why God took great pains to hide himself .....Well come on , God became a man , has given us His Word , has given us a created Universe which clearly demonstrates design and purpose . Using someones kindness against them is plain evil ....................What trash again , pure damage limitation exercise .
It must be stated : The point being made and from Richard Dawkins himself , is the POSSIBILITY . You will note that the word POSSIBLE , followed by evidence of an intelligent signature within DNA , is the wording of the comment posted . What Richard Dawkins truly thinks is sealed within his own mind and only he and The Creator of all things knows this . "Not what he intended to say ..........?" But he said it and it is in context to what he said . Remember .......POSSIBLE ...
Definition of the Word POSSIBILITY or POSSIBLE .Something that may be true or may be the case.............
As Ben Stein summarized :
" Professor Dawkins was not against intelligent design , just certain types of designers , such as , GOD ."