Saturday, 17 March 2012

BIG BANG . Cosmological foolishness............Not logical after all .

COSMOLOGICAL FOOLISHNESS............Not logical after all .
BIG BANG THEORY : Is the story of origins , which proposes in the dim and distant past , approximately 12 billion years ago (open to slight variation AND according to evolutionary timelines ) there was  NOTHING . This NOTHING became unstable and exploded . Space itself was made and expanded very rapidly .
There are several difficulties with the theory :
1 First Law of Thermodynamics states = Matter and Energy cannot be created by NOTHING.
2 Quantum Perturbation of energy cannot be used to explain the production of the cosmic egg , because one has then to explain the source of the energy .
3 Orderly Universe = The orderly progress of the heavenly bodies is used for measuring Time , months , years . Order does not come from an explosion . And the claimed explosion would only produce chaos .
4 Information = Matter and Energy alone can not produce information . Matter is a medium for information and the information has to be intelligently inserted ( codes , languages , meaning DNA etc )
5 Second Law of Thermodynamics = All spontaneous changes result in a loss of order and information . An increase in entropy .
6 Energy alone , without information to direct it , cannot increase order . Proverbial bull in a China shop springs to mind . And that is what happens with undirected energy ... Chaos not order . But we live in an orderly Universe .
Don't let the cosmologists try to kid you on this one. They have not got a clue either-despite the fact that they are doing a pretty good job of convincing themselves and others that this is really not a problem.
"In the beginning," they will say, "there was nothing-no time, space, matter or energy. Then there was a quantum fluctuation from which..." Whoa! Stop right there. You see what I mean?
First there is nothing then there is something. And the cosmologists try to bridge the two with a quantum flutter, a tremor of uncertainty that sparks it all off.Then they are away and before you know it, they have pulled a hundred billion galaxies out of their quantum hats. I may not have been born in Yorkshire but I'm a firm believer that you cannot get owt for nowt .
there is a very real problem in explaining how it got started in the first place.
David Darling , New Scientist , 1996 Page 49 .
Do not let the cosmologists fool you .


Eric Lerner :
"The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities , things that we have never observed ......inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples ."
Eric Lerner , president of Lawrenceville plasma physics . Bucking the big bang , New Scientist 22/5/2004.


James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed  not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .


All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.
 "An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 .

1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .

Initial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .

Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others .

No comments:

Post a Comment