Saturday, 30 June 2012

NO fish to fishermen EVOLUTION :

Microevolution is not the kind of change that would get fish to fishermen . This is the bait and switch tactic used by evolutionary paradigm by naming this kind of change microevolution , which is the shuffling about of information already within the genome , in order to fool the masses into wrongly thinking they are observing the process that would eventually lead to the simplest of cells becoming the most complex of cells .
Microevolution will only ever produce dogs with variation , cats with variation , people with variation , bannanas with variation , apples with variation , oranges with variation , roses with variation etc .
Evolutionary biologists S.F. Gilbert, J.M. Opitz, and R.A. Raff :
The Modern Synthesis is a remarkable achievement. However, starting in the 1970s, many biologists began questioning its adequacy in explaining evolution. Genetics might be adequate for explaining microevolution, but microevolutionary changes in gene frequency were not seen as able to turn a reptile into a mammal or to convert a fish into an amphibian. Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern only the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest. As Goodwin (1995) points out, "the origin of species- Darwin's problem-remains unsolved .
Scott Gilbert, John Opitz, and Rudolf Raff, "Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology", Developmental Biology, 173, Article no. 0032, 1996, p. 361.

Friday, 29 June 2012

Rag of a hypothesis ........Charles Darwin .

Charles Darwin :
“…I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science….It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.” Charles Darwin to Asa Gray, cited by Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin, (New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1991) pp. 456, 475.
Put in context , Charles Darwin was asking not to be ridiculed for his obvious imaginitive works . He hoped future discoveries would support His theories , but they do not . His comments do , as he stated himself , run beyond the bounds of true science .

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Less transition than in Darwin's time :‎

" The record of evolution , still surprisingly jerky and ironically we have EVEN FEWER EXAMPLES OF EVOLUTIONARY TRANSITION THAN WE HAD IN DARWIN'S TIME .
By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record , such as the evolution of the horse in North America , have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information ..what appeared to be nice simple progression when relatively few data were available now appears to be much more complex and much less gradualistic .
Dr David Raup , Curator of Geology in Chicago , Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin , Vol 50 No 12 , January 1979 , page 25 .

Comments added : Darwin stated there was no such evidence to support a finely graduated organic chain , which is required by biological evolution . So , if there is less examples of evolutionary transition now , than there was when there was non , that means there is less than non now . So , actually , the evidence for biological evolution over millions of years has now gone into the negative evidence range ...STILL ACCEPT SLOW GRADUAL CHANGE ? ) 
Charles Darwin said :
"Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain , and thus , perhaps , is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory ."
Charles Darwin , Origin of Species :

Paleontologist David Kitts :
Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of seeing evolution , it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists , the most notorious of which is the presence of ...gaps... in the fossil record . Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them .
Paleontology and evolutionary theory , evolution 28 , 466 .
Biologist Francis Hitching :
If we find fossils, and if Darwin's theory was right, we can predict what the rock should contain; finely graduated fossils leading from one group of creatures to another group of creatures at a higher level of complexity. The 'minor improvements' in successive generations should be as readily preserved as the species themselves. But this is hardly ever the case. In fact, the opposite holds true, as Darwin himself complained; "innumerable transitional forms must have existed, but why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?" Darwin felt though that the "extreme imperfection" of the fossil record was simply a matter of digging up more fossils. But as more and more fossils were dug up, it was found that almost all of them, without exception, were very close to current living animals .
Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, Tichnor and Fields, New Haven, 1982, p. 40.
 " The gaps we see reflect real events in life's history - not the artifact of a poor fossil record . "
Valentine , et al . " The Biological Explosion ." 281,318 .
"Illuminating but spotty the fossil record is like a film of evolution from which 999 of every 1000 thousand frames have been lost."
National Geographic , November , 2004 .

Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Essential protein for life :

Concerning the probability of the coincidental formation of CYTOCHROME-C , an essential protein for life.
In essence, the probability of the formation of a cytochrome-C sequence is as likely as zero. That is, if life requires a certain sequence, it can be said that this has a probability likely to be realized once in the whole universe. Otherwise some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation. To accept the latter is not appropriate for the scientific cause. We thus have to look into the first hypothesis .
Ali Demirsoy, Kalitim ve Evrim (Inheritance and Evolution), Meteksan Publishing Co., Ankara, 1984, p. 61.
Pseudo Science of biological evolution is what is meant when Mr Demirsoy says scientific cause .

Monday, 25 June 2012

THE MEASURE OF THE HUMAN BODY ...................

The ingredients for the human body can be found within the world ( biosphere ) we inhabit . The ingredients for all the high tech gadgetry and our every day items we use and are familiar with are also to be found within the world ( biosphere ) we inhabit . Why is it we can clearly understand that our Tv's , cars , planes , computers , microchip's , mobile phones and ipods etc do not come together all by themselves but need intelligent input in order to create them . But , when it comes to applying this same observation to the human body , which is far above any order of complexity man could ever hope to attain , we merely dismiss it as a crazy ideology to give credit to the supreme intelligence of the Universe for our fearfully and wonderfully designed bodies ?
And there is no human creation on this planet that is able to reproduce itself and produce unique offspring .
GENESIS 2:7 Then the LORD God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.
GENESIS 1:27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him, male and female created He them’
PSALM 139:14
‘I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well’ .

Saturday, 23 June 2012

Heading towards disorder .....The Natural Law of the Universe demonstrates this :

Clearly , the Universe could not have organized itself into all the Natural Laws and the complex living organisms that inhabit our planet .
One of the Laws of Nature demonstrates it well...... The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics tells us the Universe is heading towards disorder . But the theory of evolution requires the Universe to have organised itself into an orderly Universe and into the diverse complex living organisms all around us . Observations tell us the theory of evolution is in conflict with The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics .
All natural systems degenerate when left to themselves .
Isaac Asimov : Stated :
"Another way of stating the second law then is, 'The universe is constantly getting more disorderly!' Viewed that way we can see the second law all about us. We have to work hard to straighten a room, but left to itself it becomes a mess again very quickly and very easily. Even ...if we never enter it, it becomes dusty and musty. How difficult to maintain houses, and machinery, and our own bodies in perfect working order: how easy to let them deteriorate. In fact, all we have to do is nothing, and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out, all by itself - and that is what the second law is all about."
[Isaac Asimov, "In the Game of Energy and Thermodynamics You Can't Even Break Even", Smithsonian Institution Journal (June 1970), p. 6

Friday, 22 June 2012

THE EXAMINER .........................

THE EXAMINER .........................
The person , spouting from the book at the front .
The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.
There I was sitting silently , taking in every word with wide eyes and a desire to soak up everything the person at the front was teaching me . I read the books handed to me , I copied from the board in front of me , until I could recite every word . I sat the exam and told them what they wanted to hear .
The class was on biological evolution , and how we got from a common ancestor , who lived among the trees , to a street dwelling inhabitant .
Then , as time passed by I realized that I had been INDOCTRINATED into a worldview which was built upon frauds and deception . A worldview that deliberately and purposefully leaves an intelligent mind out of the equation of how we got here . But in the next breath makes claims that all the information and coding within living things somehow did it all by itself and not only that they claim non living matter , all by itself , came alive , WOW . This to me is not logical . Are you going to be led along by the pied pipers of evolution , or are you going to question the person at the front , with the book ?
ISAIAH 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

Thursday, 21 June 2012

THE SUPERNATURAL BIG BANG .......( Evolutionary models )

THE SUPERNATURAL BIG BANG .......( Evolutionary models )
Sir Anthony John Patrick Kenny :
According to the big bang theory, the whole matter of the universe began to exist at a particular time in the remote past. A proponent of such a theory, at least if he is an atheist, must believe that the matter of the universe came from nothing and by nothing.
Anthony Kenny, The Five Ways (New York: Schocken Books, 1969), p. 66.

James Cline :
"Where did matter come from ? The best theories of the origins of the Universe still fail to explain how it managed not to turn up empty ."
James Cline , McGill University Physicist . American Scientist , March/April 2004 . P148 .
"An Open Letter To The Scientific Community."
Published in New Scientist May 22 , 2004 . 
1 ) The big bang today relies on a GROWING NUMBER OF HYPOTHETICAL ENTITIES THINGS THAT WE HAVE NEVER OBSERVED = Inflation , dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples .
2) But the big bang theory CAN NOT SURVIVE without these FUDGE FACTORS .

InDSitial signature = 33 scientist from 10 countries .

Subsequent signatures = 500
218 scientists and engineers
187 independent researchers
105 others . 
Atheism and Naturalistic materialistic evolutionary theory calls into question anything that can not be explained using a purely materialistic naturalistic explanation for The Universe , it's origin and all things within The Universe . The problem arises for this methodology of interpretation right at the beginning of that which they attempt to explain away solely by using a purely materialistic naturalistic interpretation . And that is , The big bang cosmology they use to interpret the origins of The Universe . This cosmology states that The Universe came from NOTHING , yes NOTHING . This is a clear CONTRADICTION for them and DEMONSTRATES their reliance upon the SUPERNATURAL as we are all aware NOTHING produces NOTHING and always comes to NOTHING in total . CLEARLY , there is more to our Universe and all it contains than just naturalistic and materialistic processes . The thought of The Universe having a beginning has struck fear into the hearts of many evolutionary scientists . For many centuries past , the debate as to whether or not The Universe had a beginning has raged on . BUT , why such a big deal ? The big deal will certainly be in the hand of those who say "there is a Creator of The Universe" if it can be demonstrated that indeed The Universe had a beginning , that is the big deal . There are many scientific evidences now demonstrating that INDEED The Universe had a beginning . A moment when TIME , MATTER and ENERGY came into existence . Many still try to wriggle out of this event and dream up many non demonstratable theories because they wish to deliberately reject a CREATOR of The Universe and deny where the evidence is leading .  

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

Musicians from the start .........

OUR ANCESTORS WERE NOT PRIMITIVE : Archeologists have discovered that our ancestors mined , had metallurgical factories . created air conditioned buildings , designed musical instruments , studied the stars and much more . This evidence directly contradicts the theory of evolution , but agrees completely with God's... Word .

Genesis 4:20-22

20 Adah gave birth to Jabal, who was the first of those who raise livestock and live in tents. 21 His brother’s name was Jubal, the first of all who play the harp and flute. 22 Lamech’s other wife, Zillah, gave birth to a son named Tubal-cain. He became an expert in forging tools of bronze and iron. Tubal-cain had a sister named Naamah

Tuesday, 19 June 2012

Darwin stumped at the Trilobite.............

DARWIN STUMPED at not being able to find evidence amongst the fossil record for the (never happened) evolution of the TRILOBITE:
Charles Darwin :
"For instance, I cannot doubt that all the Silurian trilobites have descended from some one crustacean, which must have lived long before the Silurian age, and which probably differed greatly from any known animal Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer ."
Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, 1859, p. 313-314.
This claim by Darwin , regarding the Silurian Trilobites having descended from a crustacean which must have differed greatly from any known animal along with all the other unfounded assumptions here , had nothing to support it then and still has nothing to support it now . But , he is correct in answering his own question to the dilemma he realized "......................I can give no satisfactory answer ."
Certainly not a TRUE THEORY but a demonstratable FALSE THEORY . Evolution = FAIL .

Monday, 18 June 2012


One (of many) evolutionary assumption claims snakes evolved from lizards which gradually lost their legs. But evolutionists are not able to answer , of what "advantage" could it be given for a lizard which had gradually begun to lose its legs, and how natural selection could prefer this creature .The oldest known snakes in the fossil record have no "intermediate form" characteristics, and they are no different from snakes of today . Oldest known snake fossil is Dinilysia, from Upper Cretaceous rocks in South America.

Robert Carroll states concerning this creature :
"shows a fairly advanced stage of evolution of these features [the specialized features of the skull of snakes]
Robert Carroll, Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, p. 235.
Already possesses all the characteristics of modern snakes.

Sunday, 17 June 2012


EVOLUTIONARY DECEPTION . What..... another , another , another , another ? Yes ....another , another , another , another .
Are you under the impression that there are ape like humans , that supposedly show a link to our past and are part of our common ancestral tree ? Well you would not be alone in thinking this because that is what we have been indoctrinated to believe...... . The main stream media is fast to lock onto anything that is banded about claiming to be a link to our origins . One of these supposed missing links (Although there is no such thing as a missing link in reality , and logicaly how can something be a link if it is not there ?) was HOMO RUDOLFENSIS .
Which is the name given to a few fossil fragments unearthed in 1972. The species supposedly represented by this fossil was designated Homo rudolfensis because these fossil fragments were found in the vicinity of Lake Rudolf in Kenya. Most paleoanthropologists accept that these fossils do not belong to a distinct species, but that the creature called Homo rudolfensis is in fact indistinguishable from Homo habilis. Richard Leakey, who unearthed the fossils, presented the skull designated KNM-ER 1470, which he said was 2.8 million years old, as the greatest discovery in the history of anthropology. According to Leakey, this creature, which had a small cranial capacity like that of Australopithecus together with a face similar to that of present-day humans, was the missing link between Australopithecus and humans. Yet, after a short while, it was realized that the human-like face of the KNM-ER 1470 skull, which frequently appeared on the covers of scientific journals and popular science magazines, was the result of the incorrect assembly of the skull fragments, which may have been deliberate. Professor Tim Bromage, who conducts studies on human facial anatomy, brought this to light by the help of computer simulations in 1992:Tim Bromage, "Faces From the Past," New Scientist, vol. 133, issue 1803, 11 January 1992, p. 41.
When it [KNM-ER 1470] was first reconstructed, the face was fitted to the cranium in an almost vertical position, much like the flat faces of modern humans. But recent studies of anatomical relationships show that in life the face must have jutted out considerably, creating an ape-like aspect, rather like the faces of Australopithecus
Tim Bromage, "Faces From the Past," New Scientist, vol. 133, issue 1803, 11 January 1992, p. 41.

The evolutionary paleoanthropologist J. E. Cronin states the following on the matter:
J. E. Cronin, N. T. Boaz, C. B. Stringer, Y. Rak, "Tempo and Mode in Hominid Evolution," Nature, vol. 292, 1981, pp. 117.

... its relatively robustly constructed face, flattish naso-alveolar clivus, (recalling australopithecine dished faces), low maximum cranial width (on the temporals), strong canine juga and large molars (as indicated by remaining roots) are all relatively primitive traits which ally the specimen with members of the taxon A. africanus.
C. L. Brace, H. Nelson, N. Korn, M. L. Brace, Atlas of Human Evolution, 2. b., Rinehart and Wilson, New York, 1979.

C. Loring Brace from Michigan University came to the same conclusion. As a result of the analyses he conducted on the jaw and tooth structure of skull 1470, he reported that "from the size of the palate and the expansion of the area allotted to molar roots, it would appear that ER 1470 retained a fully Australopithecus -sized face and dentition."

Two evolutionist anthropologists, Bernard Wood and Mark Collard, whose research was published in 1999 in Science. Wood and Collard explained that the Homo habilis and Homo rudolfensis (Skull 1470) taxa are imaginary, and that the fossils assigned to these categories should be attributed to the genus Australopithecus :

Bernard Wood, Mark Collard, "The Human Genus," Science, vol. 284, No 5411, 2 April 1999, pp. 65-71

More recently, fossil species have been assigned to Homo on the basis of absolute brain size, inferences about language ability and hand function, and retrodictions about their ability to fashion stone tools. With only a few exceptions, the definition and use of the genus within human evolution, and the demarcation of Homo, have been treated as if they are unproblematic. But ... recent data, fresh interpretations of the existing evidence, and the limitations of the paleoanthropological record invalidate existing criteria for attributing taxa to practice fossil hominin species are assigned to Homo on the basis of one or more out of four criteria. ... It is now evident, however, that none of these criteria is satisfactory. The Cerebral Rubicon is problematic because absolute cranial capacity is of questionable biological significance. Likewise, there is compelling evidence that language function cannot be reliably inferred from the gross appearance of the brain, and that the language-related parts of the brain are not as well localized as earlier studies had implied.........

...In other words, with the hypodigms of H. habilis and H. rudolfensis assigned to it, the genus Homo is not a good genus. Thus, H. habilis and H. rudolfensis (or Homo habilis sensu lato for those who do not subscribe to the taxonomic subdivision of "early Homo") should be removed from Homo. The obvious taxonomic alternative, which is to transfer one or both of the taxa to one of the existing early hominin genera, is not without problems, but we recommend that, for the time being, both H. habilis and H. rudolfensis should be transferred to the genus Australopithecus .

Friday, 15 June 2012


Evolutionary theory would have us believe there are no limits to biological change within living organisms . Charles Darwin also proposed this himself , as indeed it would be needed in order to get a simpler cell to a more complex cell . Put simply , fish to fishermen or Potato head to professor of agriculture .
But there are natural limits to Biological change and any breeder recognizes this .
Luther Burbank , considered one of the greatest breeding researches wrote about what he called " Reversion to the Average ."
" I know from my experience that I can develop a plum half an inch long or one 2.5 inches long , with every possible length in between , but I am willing to admit that it is hopeless to try to get a plum the size of a pea or one as big as a grapefruit ......there are limits to the development possible and these limits follow a law ....In short , there is undoubtedly a pull toward the mean which keeps all living things within some more or less fixed limitations ."
Luther Burbank , quoted in Wilbur Hall , Partner of Nature , 1939 p89-99

Thursday, 14 June 2012

Never mind a smooth transition there is no transition :

Evolutionists admit that common ancestors and missing links do not exist . Never mind a smooth transition there are no evidences to show the link .

Peter Bowler , review of in search of deep time by Henry Gee , free press .1999, American Scientist 88:169 , March /April , 2000 .
We cannot identify ancestors or missing links , and we can...not devise testable theories to explain how particular episodes of evolution came about .
Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians conquered the dry land , how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying , how the dinosaurs went extinct , and how humans evolved from apes are just products of our IMAGINATION , driven by PREJUDICES and PRECONCEPTIONS.
Peter Bowler , review of in search of deep time by Henry Gee , free press .1999, American Scientist 88:169 , March /April , 2000 .


Wednesday, 13 June 2012

The TRIUNE GOD demonstrated through His Creation :

The TRIUNE GOD demonstrated through His Creation :
We are told in The Bible , Gods Word , that His Creation reveals Him . That man is without excuse for not knowing God , who
indeed created The Universe and all it contains .
His Word states : ROMANS 1:20 For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world, by the things made being understood, are plainly seen, both His eternal power and Godhead -- to their being inexcusable .
The Bible demonstrates Him who created all things as a triune God , three in one . God The Father , God The Son and God The Holy Spirit . So is their evidence in nature for a triune Godhead ? Yes , there is .
The first verse of the Bible is GENESIS 1:1 In the BEGINNING God (Hebrew -- Eloh(im) = Plural) created the HEAVENS and the EARTH.
Three of the words used here are :
God created a) BEGINNING / Time = past , present and future = 3 in 1
God created b) HEAVENS / Space = 3 dimensional = length, width, and depth (or height) = 3 in 1
God created c ) EARTH / Matter = solid , liquid and gas = 3 in 1 .
We also have :
3 primary colors .
3 musical notes sound like 1 .
3 letter ( chemical ) words ( codons ) in the genetic code ( DNA ) .
HIS CREATION surely does reveal THE CHRISTIAN GODHEAD ....God The Father , God The Son and God The Holy Spirit . The THREE are ONE .

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

The intellectual knockers ...........

PSALM 56:4 In God I will praise his word, in God I have put my trust; I will not fear what flesh can do unto me.​6.htm

With all the crazy claims of those who propose the evolutionary paradigm , it is not surprising that one of their main tactical manoeuvres is to ridicule and mock those who call their religious , philosophical and ideological worldview into question .....srh
The more we care about honoring God, the less we will care about receiving honors from men. The more we care about being approved as a faithful workman of God, the less we will care whether others condemn or oppose us on their own puny authority (2 Tim. 2:15). Modern Christians are constantly exhorted to care. This is legitimate; indeed it is inescapable. But the problem is that we are told regularly to care about all the wrong things.
It is said among us, If we continue to maintain that God created the world in six days, we will not be granted academic respectability. To which we must reply, well, who cares? Why should we care that the guardians of the academy believe we are not intellectually respectable? They believe that the moose, the sperm whale and the meadowlark are all blood relatives. Why do we want their seal of approval? It is like asking Fidel Castro to comment on the economic viability of Microsoft.1
Doug Wilson, Sanctified Apathy, Tabletalk, November 2002, pp. 60–61. 

Sunday, 10 June 2012


Elaine Morgan, an evolutionary paleoanthropologist, makes the following confession with reference to the vast chasm between man and ape :
Elaine Morgan :
Four of the most outstanding mysteries about humans are: 1) why do they walk on two legs? 2) why have they lost their fur...? 3) why have they developed such large brains? 4) why did they learn to speak?The orthodox answers to these questions are: 1) 'We do not yet know;' 2) 'We do not yet know;' 3) 'We do not yet know;' 4) 'We do not yet know.' The list of questions could be considerably lengthened without affecting the monotony of the answers .
Elaine Morgan, The Scars of Evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994, p. 5.